Swine Flu vaccine miscarriage risk

Kinda glad I didn't take it now! I didn't read the whole article, but thought it was definitely worth putting up on here!

http://preventdisease.com/news/10/091410_H1N1_miscarriages_shocking_report.shtml

Warning All Pregnant Women: Miscarriages From H1N1 Vaccine As High As 3,587 Cases

A shocking report from the National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW) presented data from two different sources demonstrating that the 2009/10 H1N1 vaccines contributed to an estimated 1,588 miscarriages and stillbirths. A corrected estimate may be as high as 3,587 cases. NCOW also highlights the fact that the CDC failed to inform their vaccine providers of the incoming data of the reports of suspected H1N1 vaccine related fetal demise.

NCOW collected the data from pregnant women (aged 17 to 45) that occurred after they were administered a 2009 A-H1N1 flu vaccine.The raw data is available on the ProgressiveConvergence.com website

Using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), including updates through July 11, 2010 as a second ascertainment source, capture-recapture statistical methods were used to estimate the true number of miscarriages and stillbirths following A-H1N1 flu vaccination in the U.S.

Typically , even so-called "complete" studies conducted by the CDC have been shown to miss from 10% to 90% of the actual cases because of under-reporting.

The statistical method employed is an expeditious and cost effective method of attempting to ascertain a complete count of all cases when two or more ascertainment sources (VAERS and NCOW survey) have failed to collect all the existing cases.

Overall, this approach show that approximately 15% of the occurences of a miscarriage or stillbirth were actually reported.

The ascertainment-corrected estimate for the total number of 2009-A-H1N1-flu-shot-associated miscarriages and stillbirths during the 2009-2010 flu season is 1,588 (95% goodness-of-fit confidence interval, 946 to 3587). That is, the lower and upper range-probability of miscarriage and stillbirths due to the H1N1 vaccine was as low as 946 and as high as 3,587.

Eileen Dannemann, Director of NCOW, stated that before she made a presentation in Rockville, MD, Sept 3, 2010 at the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) meeting. "Dr. Marie McCormick, (long time CDC gal) chair person of the Vaccine Risk and assessment working group, announced that there were NO ADVERSE EVENTS in pregnant women as it concerns the H1N1 vaccine this past flu season," directly contradicting the evidence publicly available.  "This baseless and fallacious assessment by the CDC assessment group has given the green light to the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP ) to strongly recommend the 2010/11 flu shot containing not only the offending H1N1 viral component and the neurotoxin mercury (Thimerosal), but 2 other viral strains- a 3 in 1 shot to to all people, including pregnant women,  Dannemann said.

Eileen Dannemann, Director, National Coalition of Organized Women Speech, Friday, September 3, 2010 ACCV Children’s Vaccine Program meeting:

The CDC ascertained that there were 56 maternal deaths (assuming the fetuses died with them).  Dr. Alicia Siston’s study acknowledged that most of these deaths were unconfirmed as being H1N1 virus cause of death despite the fact that the CDC had tests that could have verified, for certain, that these were H1N1 related deaths.

Initially, at the beginning of the H1N1 pandemic consequence management drill there were allegedly 30 maternal deaths.  It was these deaths that the CDC used as propaganda to initiate a campaign to vaccinate the pregnant population. 

In 2007/2008 there were 7 total VAERS reports on vaccine-related fetal demise. In 2009/10 there were 178 VAERS and 70 other source with 7 over laps…that is 241 reports.

Simplistically speaking not vaccinating would have been at the low range 85 times safer for the fetus than vaccinating or at the higher range 192 times safer.  From the grow child in-utero point of view it would have been safer not to vaccinate.

Since the variables (component or synergy of components) in the 2009 H1N1 vaccine have not been identified as to the cause of the H1N1 vaccine-related fetal deaths, we recommend that the ACIP/CDC cease recommending to vaccine providers, and to the public, flu shots to pregnant women; that they adhere to the FDA and manufacturers’ warnings that the flu shot be given to pregnant women only if clearly needed.
The new 2010/11 season combination flu shot contains variables found in the 2009 H1N1 flu shot, including the controversial Thimerosal

Considering that the 56 maternal deaths in Dr. Alicia’s Siston’s study, allegedly due to the H1N1 virus itself, are unverified H1N1 virus related, we emphasize that inoculating pregnant women with another untested vaccine containing a combination of components found in the offending 2009 H1N1 vaccine is insupportable.
We emphasize that it can be argued that it was an act of gross negligence that the CDC failed to inform their vaccine providers of the incoming VAERS data of the reports of suspected H1N1 vaccine related fetal demise.  It can also be argued that the CDC willfully withheld the information to their vaccine providers that the 30 original maternal deaths were mostly unconfirmed.

We recommend strongly, considering that the same major questionable components, the H1N1 component and Thimerosal, will be used in the 2010/11 season in a combination flu shot, that all vaccine providers are appraised of  last seasons VAERS reports as it concerns pregnant women and that pregnant women be given the vaccine information that properly advises them of the risk to benefit as stated herein.  And that the CDC withdraws their recommendation to pregnant women and adhere to the FDA/manufacturers warning on the insert packages that the flu shot not be given to pregnant women unless clearly needed.

It is my understanding that the CDC got away with transcending the FDA warning and vaccinating the pregnant women with an untested vaccines because…a pandemic engenders the “clear needed” caveat…. that vaccinating pregnant women was “clearly needed” during a pandemic or potential pandemic. Moreover, the CDC proof in the pudding for this egregious initiative was the 30 maternal deaths, albeit clearly “unconfirmed”

Eileen Dannemann is the Director of the National Coalition of Organized Women, and represents individuals spending their own time and money as to speak up for progressive change and a new vision for America…and the world. For more information, visit the Progressive Convergence Website.

Low Amniotic fluid levels. Time to panic?

http://www.themidwifenextdoor.com/?p=1141

Written on September 14, 2010 at 6:51 pm by Birth Sense

Low Amniotic Fluid Levels: A Cause For Panic?

Have you ever noticed how many recommendations in modern obstetrics end with the caveat, “However, studies have not shown a difference in perinatal outcomes”.

What exactly do those words mean? In plain English, the authors could say, “None of these interventions we’re recommending have made a difference in how many babies end up having problems”.

Take, for example, the situation of oligohydramnios, or low levels of amniotic fluid, in late pregnancy. Oligo, as those in the medical professions call it for short, has many possible causes. Some of them are serious. In most cases, the earlier in pregnancy that the oligo appears, the more potential risk it carries. It may be caused by kidney problems in the baby, or congenital defects.

The type of oligo I’d like to discuss today is the type that shows up late in pregnancy, with a normal baby, and no known cause. The type that causes everyone to panic and decide to induce the mother with low fluid, even if her cervix is not very favorable for induction. The poor mother as often as not then ends up with a cesarean for failure to progress or fetal distress.

We seem to have had a run of women diagnosed with oligo late in their pregnancies, along with suspicion of growth restricted babies. The two often go hand-in-hand, as fluid levels may decrease if the growth-restricted baby’s kidneys are receiving less blood in order to protect the brain.

But in all but one of the dozen or so recent cases I was involved in, every baby ended out NOT being growth restricted and most of the women did not even have oligo! You don’t have oligo when you are soaking chux pad after chux pad throughout several hours of labor. This trend concerns me, because we are doing a lot of inductions unnecessarily. I decided to see what the literature says.

Interestingly, much of the recent literature states that the two most common techniques of measuring fluid levels, the AFI (aminiotic fluid level index) and SDP (single deepest pocket) “were unreliable for detecting true AF volumes” (Magann, et al). Yet we keep using these tests and subjecting women to fear and stress through repeated testing and screening, and even inductions when there is no indication that the baby is not doing well. Over and over, I read that inducing a woman with low amniotic fluid when there is no indication of fetal distress does NOT improve outcomes. But we do know that inductions can lead to other problems, such as increased c-section rates, increased use of pain medication, and increased need for forceps or vaccuum.
What is more, other studies have indicated that two simple interventions can help bring amniotic fluid levels up: drinking lots of water, and immersing the body in water daily. In my practice, women who have religiously had extra water to drink and spent at least one hour daily submerged in water have all succeeded in raising their AFI’s to normal or nearly normal levels. Of course, my experience is purely anecdotal, but I include a reference below to a study that validated the use of submersion to raise AFI levels.

So what can you do if you are diagnosed with oligo? First, consider where you are in your pregnancy. If this occurs late in prenancy, it is less likely to indicate a problem with the baby. Rather than rushing to an induction out of fear or stress, reassure yourself by reviewing the studies below that indicate no change in outcomes by hurrying to induction. Talk with your provider about trying hydration and submersion to raise your fluid levels. Consider the possibility that the test may be inaccurate, and that if your baby is doing well, there is no need to induce labor. Arm yourself with the facts, and advocate intelligently for yourself and your baby.

Literature supporting oral hydration and immersion in water to improve amniotic fluid levels:
1. Chandra PC, Schiavello HJ, Lewandowski MA. (2000). Effect of oral and intravenous hydration on oligohydramnios. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 45(4), 337-341.
2. Deka D, Malhotra B. (2000). Role of maternal oral hydration in increasing amniotic fluid volume in pregnant women with oligohydramnios. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 73, 115-156.
3. Strong TH. (1993). Reversal of oligohydramnios with subtotal immersion: A report of five cases, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 169(6), 1595-1597.
Literature reporting overdiagnosis of low amniotic fluid index measurements and lack of improved outcomes with induction:
1. Maann EF. Chauhan SP, Barrilleaux PS, Whitworth NS, McCurley S, Martin JN. Ultrasound estimate of amniotic fluid volume: color Doppler overdiagnosis of oligohydramnios. Obstet Gynecol 2001 Jul;98(1):71-4.
2. Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Doherty DA, Magann MI, Morrison JC. The evidence for abandoning the amniotic fluid index in favor of the single deepest pocket. Am J Perinatol. 2007 Oct;24(9):549-55. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
3. Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Barrilleaux PS, Whitworth NS, Martin JN. Amniotic fluid index and single deepest pocket: weak indicators of abnormal amniotic volumes. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):737-40.

After the birth, what a family needs

I got this off the Unassisted Childbirth forums at http://www.unassistedchildbirth.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=6304&p=63290#p63290 .  I love these ladies, they are so knowledgable when it comes to childbirth!  I wish I had found this article about 2 months ago, before my 2nd son was born! Actually, before my first would have been great, but oh well, I'll have it for next time! 

OCTOBER 28, 2008
AFTER THE BIRTH, WHAT A FAMILY NEEDS
“Let me know if I can help you in any way when the baby is born.” … “Just let me know if you need a hand.” … “Anything I can do, just give me a call.”

Most pregnant women get these statements from friends and family but shy away from making requests when they are up to their ears in dirty laundry, unmade beds, dust bunnies and countertops crowded with dirty dishes. The myth of “I’m fine, I’m doing great, new motherhood is wonderful, I can cope and my husband is the Rock of Gibraltar” is pervasive in postpartum land. If you’re too shy to ask for help and make straight requests of people, I suggest sending the following list out to your friends and family. These are the things I have found to be missing in every house with a new baby. It’s actually easy and fun for outsiders to remedy these problems for the new parents but there seems to be a lot of confusion about what’s wanted and needed…

1. Buy us toilet paper, milk and beautiful whole grain bread.
2. Buy us a new garbage can with a swing top lid and 6 pairs of black cotton underpants (women’s size____).
3. Make us a big supper salad with feta cheese, black Kalamata olives, toasted almonds, organic green crispy things and a nice homemade dressing on the side. Drop it off and leave right away. Or, buy us frozen lasagna, garlic bread, a bag of salad, a big jug of juice, and maybe some cookies to have for dessert. Drop it off and leave right away.
4. Come over about 2 in the afternoon, hold the baby while I have a hot shower, put me to bed with the baby and then fold all the piles of laundry that have been dumped on the couch, beds or in the room corners. If there’s no laundry to fold yet, do some.
5. Come over at l0 a.m., make me eggs, toast and a 1/2 grapefruit. Clean my fridge and throw out everything you are in doubt about. Don’t ask me about anything; just use your best judgment.
6. Put a sign on my door saying “Dear Friends and Family, Mom and baby need extra rest right now. Please come back in 7 days but phone first. All donations of casserole dinners would be most welcome. Thank you for caring about this family.”
7. Come over in your work clothes and vacuum and dust my house and then leave quietly. It’s tiring for me to chat and have tea with visitors but it will renew my soul to get some rest knowing I will wake up to clean, organized space.
8. Take my older kids for a really fun-filled afternoon to a park, zoo or Science World and feed them healthy food.
9. Come over and give my husband a two hour break so he can go to a coffee shop, pub, hockey rink or some other r & r that will delight him. Fold more laundry.
10. Make me a giant pot of vegetable soup and clean the kitchen completely afterwards. Take a big garbage bag and empty every trash basket in the house and reline with fresh bags.
These are the kindnesses that new families remember and appreciate forever. It’s easy to spend money on gifts but the things that really make a difference are the services for the body and soul described above. Most of your friends and family members don’t know what they can do that won’t be an intrusion. They also can’t devote 40 hours to supporting you but they would be thrilled to devote 4 hours. If you let 10 people help you out for 4 hours, you will have the 40 hours of rested, adult support you really need with a newborn in the house. There’s magic in the little prayer “I need help.”
First posted online August 2001

The person who posted at this site added the following: Give mom a good massage. Make her a nice herbal infusion. Get her a nice movie to watch while she nurses baby and you wash the cloth diapers for her.
Hope this helps.